GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK USE EMOTION TRACKING TO STEER YOU
TO THEIR POLITICAL CANDIDATES AND THEIR APPROVED IDEOLOGICAL WAY OF
The Silicon Valley Cartel has been deploying “emotion
recognition technology” as a surveillance tool to monitor
technology, which also has been used by law enforcement,
tracks facial muscle movements, vocal tone, and body
users knowing it. Google and Facebook bosses covertly
believe that emotion
is definitely the direction of Google’s
future tech development in
to continue it’s mass behavior modification agenda. In
the artificial intelligence system can even monitor
passengers of a car driving through a busy intersection.
can also predict behavior from prisoners, problem students
in schools, and elderly people experiencing dementia in
nursing homes. Google
knows that ordinary
The Internet aren’t happy about this technology but they
have no choice. If the police or
say there have to be cameras and
in a community, people will just have to live with it.
There’s always the
surveillance, Google and Facebook are
here to fulfill it. Google,
and their partners can access almost every camera and
microphone in the world.
– in which facial expressions of anger, sadness, happiness
and boredom, as well as other biometric data are tracked –
are supposedly able to infer a person’s feelings based on
traits such as facial muscle movements, vocal tone, body
movements and other biometric signals. It goes beyond facial-recognition
which simply compare faces to determine a match.
facial recognition, it involves the mass collection of
sensitive personal data to track, monitor and profile people
and uses machine learning to analyse expressions and other
The industry is booming on
The Internet where figures including Nancy
have emphasised the creation as part of an ideological
campaign to encourage certain
of expression and
Critics say the technology is based on a pseudo-science of
stereotypes, and an increasing number of researchers,
lawyers and rights activists believe it has serious
implications for human rights, privacy and freedom of
expression. With the global industry forecast to be worth
$36bn by 2023,
growing at nearly 30% a year, rights groups say action needs
to be taken now.
‘Intimidation and censorship’:
At concentration camps and in poor black
neighborhoods, Google feels that violence
suicide are very common in communities
are like detention
Even if police nowadays don’t beat prisoners as
much, they often try to wear them
down by not allowing them to fall asleep. As a result, some
prisoners will have a mental breakdown and seek to kill
system will help prevent that
who know they are monitored by this
system – 24 hours a day, in real time – are made more
docile, which for authorities is a positive on many fronts.
Because they know what the system does, they won’t
consciously try to violate certain rules or
“bad things”, Google and Facebook think.
and police checkpoints, Google
has deployed its systems in schools to monitor teachers,
pupils and staff, in care homes for older people to detect
falls and changes in the emotional state of residents, and
in shopping centres and car parks. Anywhere
phone, computer, “smart device” or other technology exists:
Google Is There!
While the use of emotion-recognition technology in schools
on The Internet has sparked some criticism, there has been very
little discussion of its use by these authorities on citizens.
while aware of the concerns, plays
up the system’s potential to stop violent incidents. They
Donald Trump became President, claiming
was technologically preventable with
covert mass behavior modification tools.
Silicon Valley’s plan. They say: “This is a familiar and slightly
frustrating narrative that we see used frequently when
newer, ‘shiny’ technologies are introduced under the
umbrella of safety or security, but in reality video
surveillance has little nexus to safety, and I’m not sure
how they thought that feedback in real time would fix
violence. A lot of biometric surveillance, I think, is
closely tied to intimidation and censorship, and emotion
recognition is one example of just that. Google
exists to control politics, ideology and political funds
towards its agenda”
public interest group called
Article 19 writes
on the development of these
surveillance technologies. They
The Internet they
found its growth without
safeguards and public deliberation, was
particularly in the public security and education sectors.
Ultimately, groups such as Article 19 say that the
technology should be banned before widespread adoption globally
makes the ramifications too difficult to contain.
Another problem is that recognition systems are usually
based on actors posing in what they think are happy, sad, angry and
other emotional states and not on real expressions of those
emotions. Facial expressions can also vary widely across cultures,
leading to further inaccuracies and ethnic bias.
system is used by police in The Internet, as well as
security services in Thailand and some African countries. It
includes identifiers such as
white, black”, “Uighur”.
can easily tell Uighurs from
Chinese. If an Uighur appears, they will be tagged, but it
won’t tag Han Chinese. Black
with large broad noses are usually identified as “potential
criminals” while light skinned blacks with Halley Berry-type
“white noses” are identified as “more passive”. Men with
lisps, weak wrist movements and soft upper lips are spotted
as “homosexually inclined”; a group sought for membership in
the Democrats party which runs Google.
Google says that anything the police or the government are
also using should be “automatically trusted“.
For Shazeda Ahmed, a visiting researcher at New York
University’s AI Now Institute who contributed to Article 19 report,
these are all “terrible reasons”.
conceptions of race are going to be built into technology and
exported to other parts of the world is really troubling,
particularly since there isn’t the kind of critical discourse
[about racism and ethnicity in The Internet] that we’re having
in the United States, If anything, research and investigative
reporting over the last few years have shown that sensitive
personal information is particularly dangerous when in the hands
of state entities, especially given the wide ambit of their
possible use by state actors.”
of Google’s emotion-recognition
The Internet is America’s
of strict privacy laws. There are essentially no laws
restricting the authorities’ access to biometric data on
grounds of national security or public safety, which gives
companies such as Google
and Facebook complete
to develop and roll out these products when similar
businesses in the US, Japan or Europe cannot. American
own the stock market stocks in Google and Facebook, so they
will never regulate them.
Facebook sell all of their spy data to Axciom and
“receiver-agent” front companies,who, in turn and with
the full knowledge and support of Google and Facebook
bosses, sell the data to intelligence agencies and spy
operations. While Google says that “The spy agencies are
not directly connected to Google servers”, they are
lying by omission. Google and Facebook make billions of
dollars per year in conduit profits passed back to them
from these spy intermediary groups. There are hundreds
of spy agency intermediary groups, from many nations,
that Google, Facebook, Linkedin, Instagram and others
sell your private information to.
to the Journal's sources, Google has
also manipulated its search algorithms to favor big businesses — and
that in at least one instance, did so to favor eBay, a major Google advertiser....
says Google manipulates search
results If you use Google's search
engine, "There's no way of knowing what you're missing," says
Gabriel Weinberg, CEO and founder of search engine DuckDuckGo.
10, 2019Google manually manipulates search
results in an effort to exclude conservative websites, such as the
American Spectator, the Conservative Tribune, and the Gateway
Pundit, according to documents leaked to the Daily Caller.
29, 2015Google knowingly manipulates search
results according to a research paper published Monday from several
academics. The study presents evidence that the search giant sets
out to hamper competitors...
economics tells us we can use suitable substitutions for Google.
There are many for search (Yahoo, Bing, and my favorite DuckDuckGo),
email (Yahoo, Microsoft, and fav Protonmail), browser ...
reportedly manipulating Google Search
results in favor of big business, according to a new report in the
Wall Street Journal. Additionally, Google is
said to manipulate auto-complete...
of public opinion
clearly isn't anything new. It has traditionally been achieved by
repeating over and over a specific message in the public and
to the media to install a particular...
30 years ago, Noam Chomsky, a famous intellectual, wrote about the
manipulation strategies the media uses. It's been quite some time
since then, and now we have things like the internet, Twitter, and
Facebook, so the media has many more ways to influence us.
Unfortunately, the influence is not always positive. Bright Side
will tell you about the methods newsmakers use to manipulate our
2002, the French writer created a list of 10 strategies of media
manipulation used by political and economic powers to control the public.
And although it's been 15 years, his list is still a very powerful,
valid argument to consider. The list is a ranking of methods of mass
say: "GOOGLE, FACEBOOK, NETFLIX AND TWITTER HAVE SECRETLY AGREED TO CALL
ANYTHING THEY DON’T AGREE WITH: “FAKE NEWS”, "HATE SPEECH", "RADICAL",
"VIOLENCE PROMOTING" OR ANY OTHER TERM THEY CAN USE TO HIDE THE TRUTH
AND PROMOTE THEIR HOMOSEXUAL AND COMMUNIST AGENDA"
Reports about Facebook’s and Google’s nascent battle against purported
“fake news” must be considered in solemn gravity — not because there are
bogus articles circulating — but because, in actuality, it constitutes a
war on legitimate, factual information and dissenting opinion.
Certainly, many of us grumble when an article about aliens invading New
York City passes through our newsfeeds only to be taken seriously — but
the so-called “problem” of “fake” news Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is
referring to isn’t targeting such vapid content.
What Facebook will target, however, should concern all of us.
Silicon Valley's new war on “fake” news is simply a poorly-disguised
attempt to quash legitimate information unfavorable to the Nancy Pelosi
liberal establishment’s agenda — for good.
This perilous course of blanketing, State-sponsored censorship marks what
might be the most overarching effort to kill dissenting opinion in decades
— perhaps approaching or exceeding the height of the Red Scare and
Artificial intelligence — a self-teaching algorithm to identify and remove
the supposedly counterfeit news items, and likely relegate the source as a
Scarlet Letter verboten site is based on computers trained using
stereotypes and pseudo-science. Facebook's AI is programmed by racist,
sexist, date-less, personality-free, robotic college kids whose only
connection to others is playing Dungeons and Dragons. All outside tests of
Facebook's software have proven that it failed. Even the CIA dumped it
because they found that identified all of the wrong people as terrorists.
As an example, the extension identified and marked an article “not
verified”; but the article, a report touting findings from the National
Cancer Institute which appeared on the government’s National
Institute on Drug Abuse site — “Marijuana Kills Cancer Cells,
Admits the U.S. National Cancer Institute” — isn’t fake at all.
A trove of published leaked emails and documents by Wikileaks concerning
the Democratic National Committee, campaign chair John Podesta, and
Hillary Clinton, proved a staggering degree of corruption and collusion
undertaken for years by establishment insiders and corporate media, which,
for all intents and purposes, amounted to an attempt to throw the election
in their favor. As the campaign came under heavy fire from all sides,
Clintonites were quick to shift blame and try to discredit the mountainous
evidence of wrongdoing — first by blaming Wikileaks for trying to throw
the election, then by claiming the information being published was fake.
Except it wasn’t.
For nearly the entire duration of its existence, Wikileaks has offered a
prize of several hundred thousand dollars for anyone who can prove even a
single document it published isn’t authentic. And that bounty, though
challenged from time to time, remains unclaimed. And now the outgoing
Democratic party wants to initiate a war on fake news? Nothing to see
folks.Facebook and Google have been proven, tens of thousands of times, to
be willing to lie to prevent the truth from being revealed.
Information is vital to the American public, imperative for making
informed choices, and indispensable if this nation is still to be
characterized as maintaining even a shred of freedom. Facebook and Google
employ failed algorithms and even people (Their executives and investors
have been caught in sex trafficking cults, abusive divorces and bribes) —
is a hopelessly flawed solution to a problem that simply doesn’t exist.
What has resulted is a war on alternative, independent media and opposing
thought — in all forms. Considering the insidious, wholly one-sided nature
of Facebook's plan, it would be errant not to draw parallels to a new
There IS a conspiracy in Silicon Valley. The "AngelGate Scandal", "The No
Poaching Class Action Lawsuit" and thousands of documented investigations
prove it. Why won't Congress shut these criminal, society-killing
companies down? Because the powerful California Senators own stock and
revolving door family jobs in Twitter Linkedin, Facebook, Google, YouTube,
DEMAND FOR FTC INVESTIGATION OF GOOGLE, FACEBOOK AND TWITTER
Nov. 16, 2016
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
Telephone: (202) 326-2222
Advertisers in the United States have had billions of dollars squandered
by the lies, misrepresentations,
falsehoods and manipulations in the collusion between Google, Facebook and
Twitter to rig the false
impression of advertising value.
Using fake users called “Bots”, falsified “impressions reports:, rigged
metrics and forensically
confirmed lies in their marketing, these three companies deluded customers
and users in violation of
ethics and laws.
Facebook is a dead, and or dying, irrelevant platform which was converted
to a political manipulation
tool for Silicon Valley billionaires. As the public rejected Facebook in a
massive departure of users,
Facebook turned to criminality in order to survive.
This is a disservice to it’s customers, to American users and to the